If, When, and How

I distinctly remember talking once to someone who was in college majoring in some kind of engineering. When they asked me what I planned to major in and I told them English, they said, “I’ve actually been thinking of picking up a minor or a second major in English!” I grimaced and said, “What would you do that for?”

After I ran that conversation through my mind again, I was appalled at myself and my reaction. Are criticisms of the English major so pervasive that even I, an English major, had succumbed to the evil clutches of the naysayers? Was there a degree of truth to the criticisms? Continue reading “If, When, and How”

“Something Good in Itself”

I remember the day my mother stood with her back to me at the kitchen sink and explained to me why an English major was useless.

Choosing to go to community college over several other more prestigious and exciting colleges (including Geneseo) was a decision my mother had praised as practical and economical. But a degree in English? Continue reading ““Something Good in Itself””

Knowledge Is Power

In a world where technology and other amenities are constantly changing our standard of living, knowledge and its accessibility are no exception to this cultural phenomenon.  What makes knowledge so universal is the fact that it can be described or categorized as new, old, and in some cases even prophetic.  To have access to all of this information is essentially what defines the purpose of a liberal arts school.  As Joe Moran attempts to define the nature of interdisciplinarity throughout the book, Interdisciplinarity, he mentions how the German philosopher, Wilhelm von Humboldt, once described a university as a place where one can, “lay open the whole body of learning and expound both the principles and the foundations of all knowledge,” (9).  A liberal arts school offers the chance to experience a range of knowledge, which is necessary for the human mind to keep growing.  Out of the many options that one has the chance to explore as student at a liberal arts school, the study of English stands above the rest. What makes the English major so unique is the idea that English itself is comprised of a combination of skills, ranging from the obvious ability to read, to the more advanced skill of being able to take the text outside of the classroom and relate it to everyday life situations, ultimately making it easier to adapt to the situation at hand. Continue reading “Knowledge Is Power”

Are you sure?

For my English class in my senior year of high school, we had to talk about intertextuality, which loosely represents how all knowledge is inextricably linked through texts or literary mediums — everything stems from something. So, when beginning my reading into Interdisciplinarity I expected a similar idea to evolve. While there are some consistencies between the two since philosophy was seen as the basis to other disciplines therefore connecting them together, it still has a big difference. To me intertextuality is a part of the definition of interdisciplinarity if a definition can be even given. I still have yet to define interdisciplinarity myself since the ambiguity of the term makes it difficult, but I feel that this hesitance is a large part of what interdisciplinarity is. Our reading of the introduction gives many meanings to this term which connects it to many parts of our communication as a society and that’s why I’m constantly baffled when people say to me, “An English major? Are you sure? Is that going to help you with anything? You won’t get a job with that degree. You’re going to end up changing it, English majors always do.”

How come so many people question the merit of an English major when what is learned tends to be the foundation for many subjects? Even mathematics could be considered a language in itself, it has rules and some rules can be broken. Themes learned in English classes, or the Humanities at least, are common throughout the disciplines. And this isn’t a one way street, other structured, defined subjects can meld into others. Nothing is entirely separate, nothing ever will be. Each idea, thought, motion, action, decision, and more, is connected to another idea, thought, motion, action, etc. And maybe this is the definition of interdisciplinarity — the general connection between anything and everything. While this might be a possible definition, Moran makes a very interesting point, “I want to suggest that the value of the term…lies in its flexibility and indeterminacy…In a sense, to suggest otherwise would be to ‘discipline’ it, to confine it within a set of theoretical and methodological orthodoxes” (14). Interdisciplinarity cannot be defined because it cannot be disciplined; its theory prevents this from occurring.

This is why I cannot define a specific reason to be an English major. While my intentions may be to graduate as an English major, to keep on this path I’ve set myself on, if interdisciplinarity exists and cannot be disciplined to one specific ideal, then why should I discipline myself. No matter what major you’re in an English class will have to be taken and no matter how much some people may tell themselves and others that it’s useless, it will impact how they communicate and how they decide to discipline themselves. Interdisciplinarity can be used in any context, in any subject, in any way it may be used which I think presents people with more freedom to possibly create their own discipline and/or break away from the disciplines they’ve been confined to.

So, yes, I’m sure I want to be an English major.

Study One Branch of the Tree of Philosophy

So far, I have only read the Introduction of Joe Moran’s, “Interdisciplinarity,” so I am no expert but it doesn’t sound like anyone is. Interdisciplinary sounds like an updated word for philosophy. It is the center of all the disciplines yet, no one really knows how to explain it or if it is a good idea. Moran himself says, “I take interdisciplinarity to mean any form of dialogue or interaction between two or ore disciplines: the level, type, purpose and effect of this interaction remain to be examined.” To me it seems as if the scientists and researchers still do not understand this word they created for the connection of different disciplines or should I say “majors.”

I think that the philosophers and researchers try to study every single thing and then work much slower and more scattered because they can’t just focus on one field. Can you imagine what Nietzsche could have accomplished if he would have stopped and specialized in something rather than worrying about trying to “traverse the who range of human values and value-feelings”?

Moran states that Aristotle claimed that philosophy is the “universal field of inquiry which brought together all the different branches of learning.” How can one possibly major in philosophy if it is essentially the entire tree and every other discipline is the branches? Wouldn’t it be more effective if everyone picked the one branch they wanted to study to the point where they could memorize the veins in every one of their branches leaves rather than to try to know everything there is to know about that tree? We are all only human, even the scientists and philosophers, and we can only comprehend so much information. If everyone dedicated their lives to a more concise field of study, then ideas like philosophy and words like interdisciplinarity would not be as overwhelming.

Interdisciplinarity~common core?

As I was reading just the introduction of Interdisciplinarity, I couldn’t help but think of the Common Core. On page 14, there is a thesis of sorts when Moran states interdisciplinarity “attempt(s) to transcend disciplinary boundaries altogether”. The common core is basically a huge failure that immediately has me worried about the authenticity of  interdisciplinarity. From a surface layer, common core may sound appealing—the tying together of all subjects to one standard of education, everyone treated equally and at the same level. However, this is not well executed because it turns into a profit making game for large corporations, such as Pearson, which pretty much controls common core. It amounts every student to a number and it becomes all about “meeting a standard” which translates to certain grades on a test, which doesn’t mean thorough learning at all. Teachers are forced to produce the right numbers, which means more money for the right(wrong?) people. What happens is that students feel helpless and are not learning, just merely training to achieve a certain grade on a test so that it looks good as data. In this way, I’m not sure about interdisciplinarity— not sure how much sense it all makes to lump all the disciplines together—how practical it is to apply math to english and vice versa. These are, of course, all things I have to think about as I just switched my major to english. I’m not sure how much the english major applies to the real world as much as just being something I love doing and comes to me most comfortably. Maybe the english major is actually just general knowledge that everyone should participate in?

English? Really?

“Has it ever occurred to any of you that all of this is simply one grand misunderstanding? Since you’re not here to learn anything, but to be taught so you can pass these tests…” This commencement of Joe Moran’s introduction to his Interdisciplinary speaks to the core of the issue of why I decided to major in English.

“An English major? Asks Mark Edmundson in “The Ideal English Major.” “To me an English major is someone who has decided against all kinds of pious, prudent advice and all kinds of fears and resistances, to major, quite simply, in becoming a person.” Continue reading “English? Really?”