Truth, Right, Conscience

Thoreau’s Resistance to Civil Government is about how the government doesn’t handle the civil issues. However, Thoreau agrees that the government and higher ups only do anything unless it affects them.  Thoreau also talks about truth in relation to the government. In paragraphs 11, 14, and 15 the reader can make the move to theorizing in the sense of truth, right, and consciousness. The concept of the right can also be the concept of truth plus all rights are based on circumstances. If this happens to be circumstantial this means that your consciousness is also circumstantial. Therefore if your consciousness is twisted then your concept of right is also twisted. If this is all true then everyone is compromised on everything because in someway your right is wrong.

http://commons.digitalthoreau.org/civil/resistance-to-civil-government/rcg-1-14/?s=conscience

Thorough’s abstract reflection on Solitude

Disclaimer: I apologize but I am technologically inept and couldn’t figure out how to comment on digital thorough for the life of me.

Quite possibly one of the most fascinating bits of Walden that fits our criteria for moving up a level of abstraction occurs in Solitude, passage 5b, where Thorough begins by reflecting on the experience of having been asked by many men if he feels lonely all by himself in the woods, as they most certainly believe they would. Continue reading “Thorough’s abstract reflection on Solitude”

Why you asking all them questions?

You know I find myself asking God for a lot. Praying that such outcomes are on the side in which I favor. Wishing for tragedy to be demolished and non existent, and praying that the ‘bad guys’ get caught, when I hear a story on the late night news. Asking for love and leniency. I find myself asking for a lot, and I can not decide whether to blame society for the way it has pressured me into updating so that I can be compatible with the rest of the mindless machines who’s glued eyes are stuck to yet another machine, asking for yet another machine.  Or to take responsibility for my own actions. Actions that later on require me to ask for more. More time, more placement structured progress. It has driven me over the edge to recognize that my “asking” for things, not given to me has gave me tunnel vision. It is a pandemic of under-appreciation in which the antidote is its contrast. Continue reading “Why you asking all them questions?”

Thoreau’s Unconventional Viewpoints

    During the 19th century, most Americans did not have Henry David Thoreau’s transcendental philosophies which made him behave as he did. It is likely that he was one of the few people who disagreed with the word of the government and viewed slavery as wrong. In paragraph seven of “Resistance to Civil Government,” Thoreau states that he could not “for an instant recognize [the American] political organization as my government which is the slave’s government also.” From this passage, I theorize that his hatred of enslavement influenced his opposition to the state. Thoreau disagreed with the government’s policies even though they were widely accepted because of the amount of power the state held. Slavery was one of the policies he despised most because he could not understand how one human could own another without feeling guilty about it. He also pitied the state because it allowed people to partake in the act of slavery. Although Thoreau felt as though the government held too much power over its people, he made it clear that they did not show concern for slaves. In fact, the state did nothing to protect them from being wrongfully treated. These situations were some of the main reasons he moved into the woods and lost respect for the government. When I consider his stance on these issues, I begin to question how he developed these modern ideas when they were quite unpopular among other Americans.

Continue reading “Thoreau’s Unconventional Viewpoints”

The Theory of Creative Work

 In paragraph 31 of “Economy” in the book Walden, by Henry David Thoreau he speaks on an Indian man trying to find a successful way to make a profit. The Indian man has a harsh reaction when a better off white male won’t buy his baskets. Thoreau goes on to explain what the Indian male was thinking, he sees his white neighbor who is a lawyer and better off, he desires that. He starts the business expecting others to buy it since it was his contribution to the society. That didn’t seem to be the case, Thoreau explains “He had not discovered that it was necessary for him to make it worth the other’s while to buy them, or at least make him think that it was so, or to make something else which it would be worth his while to buy.” (Walden, “Economy,” par. 31)Saying that the Indian hadn’t realized that if he’s making something, make it worth someone’s while, or even persuade others to think it’s worth it. The story of the Indian man is an example of an artist at work struggling to please others.   Continue reading “The Theory of Creative Work”

From the Outside, Looking In

In today’s world, it seems that we are constantly having news shoved down our throats, whether keeping up with the lives of celebrities or attempting to stay aware of the breaking news every minute of our day. As technology progress, receiving our news is becoming much easier, and ultimately integrating with our daily activities. Surprisingly, Henry David Thoreau shared a similar sentiment with current individuals back in his days at Walden Pond. There were many factors that gave Thoreau motivation to exclude himself from his community, a significant one being the much slower pace of life that Walden Pond offered him. Thoreau was no doubt a firm believer in individual thought, urging his readers to question traditional viewpoints and the current status quo. Continue reading “From the Outside, Looking In”

Ego

A few of my classmates have expressed their distaste for Thoreau’s “narcissism”, for establishing himself as a figure of elitism over his audience.  Why do we get that message? Why not when we hear philosophers or politicians talk, do we fear the same demanding diction that we do with Thoreau? Throughout reading, I began to theorize the reasons as to why Thoreau might come off so strong, I then came across the reasoning that Thoreau simply does not fear ego. He blatantly states in ‘Economy’ paragraph 2In most books, the I, or first person, is omitted; in this it will be retained; that, in respect to egotism, is the main difference.” Continue reading “Ego”

Thoreau’s Abstract Explanations: A Critique of Modernity?

In reading Walden, I frequently found myself thinking about the historical context surrounding many of Thoreau’s arguments. Published in 1854, Thoreau’s account gives several insights into the time-period in which he lived. Of course, this move by the reader (as evoked by Thoreau) does not seem accidental. Understanding the social, economic and political environment present in 1850’s Concord seems central to most of Thoreau’s arguments. Continue reading “Thoreau’s Abstract Explanations: A Critique of Modernity?”

Abstraction on Loneliness

In paragraph 5 of Solitude, Thoreau discussed one of the most frequent comments he received when speaking about his time living alone at Walden Pond. He explains that often what people tell him is that they could never do what they did because they would miss being around people so much. This prompts Thoreau to move up a level of abstraction, not just speaking in this section about what he did, or about the comments he received from others for doing so, but theorizing about the nature of loneliness itself. Continue reading “Abstraction on Loneliness”

A Well-Worn Path

In the Conclusion of Walden, Henry David Thoreau writes about what he learned while living at Walden Pond and what he came to understand there. In the fourth paragraph, Thoreau writes about the simple path he wore through the trees from his cabin to the pond, and from there makes the transition from experience to theory. He writes about this path and wonders how easily paths must be worn in other areas of life, as well, because “The surface of the earth is soft and impressible by the feet of men; and so with the paths which the mind travels. How worn and dusty, then, must be the highways of the world, how deep the ruts of tradition and conformity!” If, in only a week, a man can walk a path enough that it endures for years after he is gone, what can years of traditions do to a society? In this theorizing, he extrapolates his own experience and projects it onto the greater world around him. The shift from experience to theory here is very gentle, and although it happens suddenly the reader is not aware of the change until it is already well under way. This is because of how smoothly it fits in, both with the structure of the passage and the content of the previous paragraphs. The transition ties in with the beginning of Conclusion, where Thoreau writes about boundaries people set for themselves, closing themselves in and limiting their own lives when there is no reason to do so. In the same way, he worries “that others may have fallen into it, and so helped to keep it open.” If others have begun to use the path that he created, he is the origin of a boundary that they conform to and that is not what he desired to achieve with his time at the pond.
I think this passage is especially interesting. In it, Thoreau takes the simple and hackneyed idea of a well-worn path and pushes his audience to look at it applied to the bigger picture. The sentiment also links back to the idea Thoreau wrote about earlier in Walden about how people should choose their own courses and not let other people’s opinions influence their choices of how to live their lives. The world is full of traditions and precedents, but just because they are the most obvious or easy choices does not mean that they are the only choices.