Thanks Mom, Thanks Toomer

“The path from A to B will always be curved.” Over and over again, my mother has relayed this phrase to me. “It’s about the journey, not the destination” and cliché after cliché. Overall, she has tried to get me to understand one message—the so-called “plan” I have paved for myself may not, and probably will not work out as I foresee it. Maybe it’s because she’s my mother, or maybe it’s my own narcissism, but I have always disregarded her notions because, in my mind, my plan will work out. I will be successful. I will accomplish the next five steps I have to get to my goal and I will not stray.

After reading Byrd and Gates biography of Toomer, I can imagine my mother’s beaming smile as everything she has told me has been affirmed by someone as successful as Toomer. I can hear her say, “and guess what happened to Toomer? He didn’t have a clear path!” Then we’d laugh, I’d say “you’re always right, I get it.” in an overly sarcastic tone, we’d sip on our cappuccinos and move on in conversation. But she is right, and she would be right about Toomer.

Reading about his life has given me a new perspective on how important the journey is. He succeeded in becoming a well-known author, but his novel Cane would not have amounted to such achievement without Toomer’s years of bumbling around, traveling, and taking up odd jobs.

“Toomer was acting principal at the Institute from September to November 1921. This seminal, three-month sojourn in the South provided him with the materials, inspiration, and much of the setting for what became the first and third sections of Cane. Prior to his first visit to the South, Toomer’s writing lacked a specific sense of place that could serve as the setting and foundation for his heart.” (Introduction I)

Toomer had to go to several different universities, ranging from body building, to agriculture, and especially to theater, so he could eventually take on his passion for theater, which, in turn, gave him inspiration to finish his novel. Evidently, Toomer adhered to interdisciplinarity throughout his life. Interdisciplinarity is when two or more academic principles combine to one outcome. It is clear that Toomer wouldn’t have been as well- rounded, and subsequently, able to include so many perspectives into his life and his writing without all of his academic endeavors. Toomer was also impatient, indecisive, and many other confusing adjectives, but that’s a whole other story.

Recently, I have realized that a lot of the things I thought I wanted to do with my life, don’t actually interest me. (Classic college, am I right?) Reading this biography has been incredibly reassuring that I am allowed to feel this way, and that hopefully similar to Toomer, I can implement interdisciplinarity into my life. With this, I can add up all of the parts of what I do like about different subjects, into one product in my life. So, thank you Toomer, for proving my mother right (hate to say it…) and for giving me a wave of comfort that the curved path is not only acceptable, but admired, and recommended.

 

 

Cane and the Frenzy

When we discussed the idea of possessing something versus being possessed by something. I found a parallel in the Byrd and Gates biography of Toomer and our class discussion. In the biography and our class discussion, I found it interesting that people were so entranced by Cane that literary groups tried to “claim” him as one of their own, the New Critics for example. As I thought about this some more, I realized that the frenzy around the novel was moving Toomer’s relationship with Cane outside the realm of Toomer possessing Cane and into Cane possessing Toomer. People became entranced or intoxicated with the novel, wanting Toomer to write a novel comparable to Cane. This related to our class discussion on the dangers of becoming intoxicated. Much like The Bacchae, Pentheus  The public intoxication with Cane was so great that it ended up affecting individuals who were not even a part of the “intoxicated frenzy”, ironically this was mainly Toomer.  Continue reading “Cane and the Frenzy”

Does a Linear Career= Successful Human?

Last class we talked about Jean Toomer’s biography and crooked career path. Comments in class were aimed at how “nowadays we are taught to stick to one career path to be successful”. However, I disagree to both parts of that statement. Firstly, I don’t really think this is a “nowadays” issue, I think it’s always been a struggle for young adults to pick a major or career path. Continue reading “Does a Linear Career= Successful Human?”

Toomer and Myself: a Similarity

The United States is made up of many different people. No two people are exactly the same-not even twins. These differences is what makes the United States such a special place to live in. People live in different areas, they celebrate different holidays, they are different races. All of these different people come together and make the United States what it needs to be-a melting pot. We praise peoples differences and make people proud of who they are and where they come from.

When Toomer did not identify as black or as white, he was no longer celebrating who he was or where he came from. Some people could interpret it as if he was embarrassed of his past and did not want people to know anything about him. He thought that by doing this, he was removing himself from the chaos. Instead, he was creating more.

If someone did that today, they would be frowned upon. The United States is such a wonderful place to live in and for Toomer to be born in Washington D.C where the president lives, and not want to celebrate his race is shocking. So many people come to the United States to be free and start a new life-Toomer was destroying his on accident.

The Role of Interdisciplinarity in Cane

Aside from my excitement in regards to reading Cane, it truly is amazing how without interdisciplinarity, there would be no Cane. Before reading the “Afterword” of Cane, I never quite connected interdisciplinarity to real-world examples.

Jean Toomer’s chaotic and quite indecisive life is the reason that Cane is the masterpiece that so many critics claim. Our stigma of a “successful person” is against everything that Toomer had done throughout his life but yet he was still successful. Due to his switching schools, indecisiveness regarding his race, indecisiveness regarding his jobs, he came to have the experiences necessary to writing a successful composite novel. The many disciplines that Toomer had the opportunities to experience, each created a conversation within each other (interdisciplinarity) that allowed this novel to come about. Had Toomer not had the experience at the movie theatre for example, “Box Seats” would not be a part of Cane. Continue reading “The Role of Interdisciplinarity in Cane”

Intertextuality: The Bacchae and The Bible

In learning about intertexuality, I found myself reflecting on a variety of works that seemed to relate to The Bacchae in many different ways. The work that kept coming to mind after nearly every major plot point (and also happened to be the most famous of the works that popped into my head) was the Bible.

In both the Bible and The Bacchae, characters are turned into, or forced to remain as, snakes as a result of their disobedience. Continue reading “Intertextuality: The Bacchae and The Bible”

Response on Cane and Pseudonym

I was not looking forward to reading this essay to learn about the author. I thought that I would learn enough about Jean Toomer through his work. Of course, if I didn’t read this essay I wouldn’t know that Jean Toomer was originally Nathan Pinchback Toomer. And that Toomer was  not brought up because of his father abandoning his dear mother.


I understand why an author would want to write under a fictitious name, it has been many times. Lewis Carroll, S.E. Hinton, Robert Galbraith. I couldn’t think of the word but I know it know! This is known as pseudonym, when authors use different names for whatever they want. Robert Galbraith is J.K. Rowling. S.E. Hinton made her name initals so she would be assumed a man and published. And Lewis Carroll is Charles Dodgson a lonely mathematician.

I don’t think it’s wrong for a writer to use a different name. In fact I have one for myself if I ever needed one. Andra Ramm. In case I wrote something I wasn’t proud of or something I wouldn’t be taken seriously in. It’s okay for authors to do this even if they are technically deceiving us. The writer that they are might be trying a completely different genre and not want to be associated and compared to their previous works. That makes complete sense. A fake name is like a fresh start, a whole career to add on top of one. So Jean Toomer may not fully be Jean Toomer but his legacy lies with this name. I believe later in the essay it talked about him wanting to or actually changing his writing name because of the exceptions that came with the Toomer name.

A pseudonym name gives an author freedom to be a different writer. I imagine it would be exciting to have a whole career based on romance novels and then change your name to publish hard core murder mysteries. But I think it’s important for me to state that I don’t think Jean Toomer changed himself really. He was always a Toomer, so truly all he changed was his first name. And I think it was a right choice because of his grandfathers amazing history to showcase his linage.

How English has Changed my Life

In high school, we used to get asked what our favorite part of each class was. I would answer, “the essays”. The meanest glares anyone could possibly imagine would be shot my way as it was the furthest thing from anyones mind when someone thinks “fun”. In my opinion, writing is fun. It is a way to fully express yourself while at the same time possibly learning a new subject, idea, or creating an argument. It has made me challenge myself in ways I did not believe were possible. I view topics differently and test myself to see what I my opinion is or how I could add to the topic. Writing about what I have read in The Bacchae has become a task as there is a tremendous amount of depth to this play. For example, I had never thought of the people as “intoxicated” as we discussed in class. My whole perspective of the play changed after that day, so I took a second look. What I had perceived as madness, ruthless, joyous people turned into drunken misfortunes. Intoxication on power, on loyalty, on obedience, and obsession; this is part of the depth I never saw and want to challenge myself to see. The women are so intoxicated on loyalty and love for Dionysus, they would kill for him, no matter the outcome. It is the high, like Pentheous’s mother feels when she kills her son, that does not last forever and then you have to deal with the consequences. It  all connects back to real life as this is true for many people; they get drunk and do stupid things and will regret it for a short or long time after it occurs. This is another aspect of English and writing that I love; connecting it to the real world. Dionysus is after revenge as his family has been destroyed and all he wants is to be worshipped. Wouldn’t anyone feel that way? People want others to look up to them and if something horrid happens in their life they want someone to pity them. I love this; writing. Writing about The Bacchae can be difficult, but in the end, the outcome is incredible.

How Literature Has Shaped History

History and literature have always been greatly distinguished both in high school and in college courses. History courses tend to rely on rote memorization of major events with a grasp of specific concepts and chronology. Whereas literature courses I’ve taken have always relied on being able to read into and decipher allegory, themes, foreshadowing, and other literary elements.

Continue reading “How Literature Has Shaped History”

Romantic Irony

Irony is something everyone knows from experience and can see it in life, but giving irony a definition would be a Herculean task. From reading the bedford, there are several types of irony, which is great because we use them all. Irony has a Greek origin Eiron, Eiron was a character who was essentially an underdog. He was a weakling but managed to defeat his opponents by tricking them or simply making them look foolish. Good idea when he could not match against them physically.

There is so many different elements to consider when thinking about irony. There is Socratic, romantic, structural! Of course, listing all the different ironies doesn’t mean you understand them. What I found the most fascinating of the whole chapter would be the Romantic irony. It was a little confusing when I was reading the chapter, so I looked up some examples and definitions to help me better understand. It is still a convoluted idea to me, because the narrator makes up our world but then in the middle shows us he is not a trustful narrator. How crazy is this idea?! We have been trusting the narrator the whole time and following everything he says! Bedford says the suspension of disbelief and the reader would surely feel this way, the reader would have a moment when they question whether or not to possibly continue on with the story! This isn’t what I thought romantic irony would be and it blows my mind. The reader is supposed to see through the narrator and appreciate the cunning nature they have. And I’m sure the reader would have to fall in the love with the narrator more, even if we can’t trust them. How could you hate a character with such a wide assortment of qualities?

I think romantic irony would add such amazing dynamic in a work. I tried to look up if this is a common tool in writing but was getting caught on dead ends. I read quite a bit, and I can say they I haven’t come across romantic irony in a very long time! It certainly should be used more, it’s truly a fascinating idea to make an untrustworthy narrator and see where the consequences lead you.  I would love to be able to try to write in romantic irony. You can’t say this is a simple technique because the ground work you have to lay out would be extensive and then to rip all that up? This would be something that would take the author awhile, but I feel like it’s a great gutsy move. This is why it’s important to read all the boring, assigned reading. You stumble across something and get super excited. That’s the beauty of English as a whole. Romantic irony is a technique that will be useful in the future, this I am positive enough.